Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 599 F.2d 984 - Doyle v. United States

Doyle v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

599 F.2d 984 · 1979

Citation profile

150
cited by 150 later decisions
October 2019
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 150 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Sargisson v. United States (1990), Maier v. Orr (1985)

33 federal appellate · 3 district ·

69019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 277 · 10 U.S.C. § 681 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 2111

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Harrington v. California · Orloff v. Willoughby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 150 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] party Cannot raise an issue on appeal to a court when it failed to raise it before an administrative agency competent to hear it____ A party is not entitled to many independent chances to prevail, and his voluntary chpice will often determine the extent of a court’s review. Decision-making bodies normally have the power to correct their own errors, ... and the Correction Board is no exception____”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Each board convened for the appointment, promotion, demotion, involuntary release from active duty, discharge, or retirement of Reserves shall include an appropriate number of Reserves, as prescribed by the Secretary concerned under standards and policies prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “has no way of evaluating the effect of the error on the judgment in the dark of what might have been but never was, ....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.