Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

6 Binn. 253

Girard v. Heyl

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1814

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1814-03-30

THE plaintiff obtained a judgment by arbitration on the 22d of last month, for about 110(3 dollars; and the fendant by an entry on the docquet suggested his freehold, to obtain a stay of execution under the act of 21st March 1806, sec. 7. - Binneit obtained a rule upon the .defendant, returnable J A . this morning, to shew cause why this suggestion or plea should not be struck off the record, upon the ground that the defendant had not such a freehold as was intended by J the…

Decided 1814-03-30

Per. Curiam.

¶1The act is toó clear for a doubt. The defendant says he can prove the estate is worth six thousand dollars. How can he prove that if a levari facias should issue, and it should be sold by the sheriff, it would bring half the money? Both the words of the law and its spirit are against the privilege in this case; the words, because the defendant has no freehold clear of incumbrances; the spirit, because it did not intend that the plaintiff’s judgment should be exposed to defeat by sale under a prior incumbrance.*

¶2Rule absolute.

¶3 The freehold in question was afterwards sold under a Ji. fa. in this case, and did not produce the amount of the mortgages and interest.

/6/binn/253 · .json · Public domain