Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 F.1d 215 - First Nat. Bank v. Smith

First Nat. Bank v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

6 F. 215

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
December 1906
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on William Shields v. Robert R Barrow · Meyer v. Construction Co. · Barney v. Baltimore City · Pacific Railroad v. Ketchum · Davenport v. Dows

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is too clear to admit of discussion that the corporations are necessary parties to suits like these. Unless they are made parties, they will not be concluded by decrees made in the cases on the merits, and the defendants might-be called upon a second time to account for the same assets at the suit of the corporation or receivers appointed over their affairs. -The defendants have the right to insist that the decree shall conclude the plaintiffs, the corporations, and all other creditors, and afford a full and complete protection against future suits for the same causes of action. Such decrees cannot be made in suits where the corporations are not parties, or by a court having no jurisdiction to require the legal presence of the corporations in the proceedings.” i”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.