¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.
¶2The points submitted in this case were fully considered and decided in the case of Landis (in error) v. Shaeffer, Lancaster district, May Term, 1818.
¶3 Siuee reported in 4 Serg. Si Raiole, 196.
6 Serg. & Rawle 299
Decided December 26, 1820
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1820-12-26
THE state of the case on which the Court was request- „ . . . » c m ed to give its opinion, was as follows : The plaintiff entered a rule of arbitration on the 23d Octo~ her, 1816, and an award in his favour for 1642 dollars, 46 cents, with interest from the 6th February, 1817, was filed on the 9th April, 1817. From this award ;the defendants pealed on the 29th April, 1817, and paid the costs.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1845
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1820-12-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.
¶2The points submitted in this case were fully considered and decided in the case of Landis (in error) v. Shaeffer, Lancaster district, May Term, 1818.
¶3 Siuee reported in 4 Serg. Si Raiole, 196.