Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 F.3d 820

Docket No. 95-6274.

Allen v. Morgan

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 22, 1995. Decided: July 11, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-07-11

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. The District of Columbia

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-07-11

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Gary Allen, Sr., appellant pro se. Joseph Crouch Coleman, Columbia, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Allen v. Morgan, No. CA-94-401-1-21AJ (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

Because the district court granted Appellant's motion for extension of time to appeal, and because this court does not have jurisdiction to grant such a motion, we deny Appellant's motion for extension of the appeal period filed in this court. We also deny Appellant's request for discovery, as such a motion may only be filed in the district court. We have reviewed the entire record for possible grounds for appeal; none exist

/60/f3d/820 · .json · Public domain