Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 F.3d 820

Docket No. 94-2253.

Louis J. Blazy v. R. James Woolsey, Director, Central Intelligence Agency

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 22, 1995. Decided: July 7, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-07-07

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. The District of Columbia

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-07-07

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Louis J. Blazy, appellant pro se. Dennis Edward Szybala, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Title VII complaint, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e-16 (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Blazy v. Woolsey, No. CA-94-438 (E.D.Va. Aug. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

We also affirm the denial of Appellant's request for subpoena of witnesses

/60/f3d/820 · .json · Public domain