Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 F.3d 822

Docket No. 94-7261.

Jackson v. Cross

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted June 22, 1995. Decided July 10, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-07-10

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · In Re: Herman E. Harston

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-07-10

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ronald Floyd Jackson, appellant pro se. Terri Hearn Bailey, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, SC; Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter Limbaugh, Willcox, Mcleod, Buyck, Baker & Williams, P.A., Florence, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant Cross. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

¶2

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/60/f3d/822 · .json · Public domain