Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

60 F.3d 823

Docket No. 95-6465.

Kirkpatrick v. Evatt

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 22, 1995. Decided: July 13, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-07-13

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Dale Conrad McQuiston v. Edward W. Murray Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. T.L. Parlett William C. Perdue Unknown and W. Rhoades

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-07-13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Doris Kirkpatrick, Appellant Pro Se.

James M. Brailsford, III, E. Meredith Manning, ROBINSON, MCFADDEN & MOORE, P.C., Columbia, SC; Larry Cleveland Batson, Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, SC; Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting in part the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kirkpatrick v. Evatt, No. CA-92-3130-3-22-A (D.S.C. Feb. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/60/f3d/823 · .json · Public domain