60 N.J. Eq. 437
Decided March 5, 1900
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1900-03-05
87 and $1,106.59 respectively. On December 13th, 1897, one Tunis got a judgment against the company for $2,035. It is the sale under the execution issued upon these judgments that the bill seeks to restrain. In May, 1893, there existed a mortgage of $7,500 upon the property of the company, which mortgage Was held by one Hughes. The company had other debts amounting to $6,000.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1933
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1900-03-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons contained in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed who advised it.
¶2For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Ludlow, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Fixon, Vredenburgh — 13.
¶3For reversal — Fone.