Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

600 So. 2d 58

Colin v. Hinckley

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-07-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1995

1 state decisions

Relies on Hanor v. Hinckley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-07-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We grant the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.490(c); Hanor v. Hinckley, 584 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Respondent Hinckley shall vacate the order of reference to the general master and shall promptly schedule a hearing before the court on all pending applications. We expressly disapprove of the practice, if it is a practice, of routinely assigning all such matters to a general master and then overruling any objection by a non-consenting party.

¶2MANDAMUS GRANTED.

DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.GUNTHER, J., concurring in result only.
/600/so2d/58 · .json · Public domain