Gaujacq v. EDF, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
601 F.3d 565 · 2010
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 70 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at Arms · Jones v. Bernanke · Halberstam v. Welch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n employer’s words and other actions ... considered in context ... would ‘dissuade a reasonable worker’ from filing a claim and thus result in actionable retaliation.” Id. at 578 (quoting Burlington, 548 U.S. at 57 , 126 S.Ct. 2405 ). The court concluded that a reasonable worker”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“all the evidence, which includes not only the prima facie case but also the evidence the plaintiff offers to attack the employer's proffered explanation for its action and other evidence of retaliation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[y]our career is dead in EDF if you file the claim”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.