Salvador v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 520 So. 2d 276 - State v. Williams · 472 So. 2d 737 - JSH v. State · Johnson v. State · 559 So. 2d 1274 - Arling v. State · O'Steen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In addition to any punishment, the court shall order the defendant to make restitution to the victim for: 1. Damage or loss caused directly or indirectly by the defendant's offense; and 2. Damage or loss related to the defendant's criminal episode.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. AG v. State · A.G. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.