Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

602 So. 2d 702

Carroll v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-08-14

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1993

2 state decisions

Relies on Anderson v. State · 576 So. 2d 434 - Walker v. State · Pope v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-08-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Upon review of this Anders appeal, we have identified two minor sentencing errors. First, the public defender’s fee and lien in the judgment are stricken and the matter remanded for the required notice and specific opportunity for the defendant to be heard before assessment. Pope v. State, 598 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Rice v. State, 576 So.2d 434 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Anderson v. State, 556 So.2d 527 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Second, there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement of restitution to the victim, Margaret Little, and the written order ($9.39 vs. $99.39), which requires clarification or correction.

¶2SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/602/so2d/702 · .json · Public domain