Edison v. Douberly’s Empirical Analysis
604 F.3d 1307 · 2010
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey · Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co. · Shotz v. City of Plantation · United States v. Silva · Green v. City of New York 04-1006-
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(A) any State or local government; (B) any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or States or local government; and (C) the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, and any commuter authority[J”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A private contractor does not...become liable under Title II merely by contracting with the State to provide governmental services, essential or otherwise.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“constrained by the plain meaning of the statutory language in the context of the entire statute, as assisted by the canons of statutory construction.” 604 F.3d at 1310 . Although the meaning of the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.