Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 So. 2d 344 - McGee v. State

607 So. 2d 344 - McGee v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stokley v. State · Watkins v. State · Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen. · 555 So. 2d 1158 - Qualls v. State · 568 So. 2d 319 - Colvette v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In addition to any penalties heretofore or hereafter provided by law for any person convicted of an unlawful sale of a controlled substance, there is hereby imposed a penalty of five years incarceration in a state corrections facility with no provision for probation if the situs of such unlawful sale was on the campus or within a three-mile radius of the campus boundaries of any public or private school, college, university or other educational institution in this state."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[W]e believe that the legislature clearly intended to protect these areas . . . from the evils associated with drug activities,' Qualls v. State , 555 So.2d 1158 , 1165 (Ala.Cr.App. 1989), and to provide for more serious sentences to those individuals who sell illegal drugs near schools or housing projects.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Kendrick v. State , 377 So.2d 1112 , 1114 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979), writ denied, 377 So.2d 1114 (Ala. 1979), citing Stoley v. State , 254 Ala. 534 , 541 , 49 So.2d 284 (1951); Watkins v. State , 357 So.2d 156 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 357 So.2d 161 (Ala. 1978).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.