United States v. Batson’s Empirical Analysis
608 F.3d 630 · 2010
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1365 (Federal Anti-Tampering Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Hughey v. United States · Burns v. United States · United States v. Matthews · United States v. Nachtigal · Gall v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) enter a restitution order for the full amount of the victim's loss, if such order is authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 1593 , § 2248, § 2259, § 2264, § 2327, § 3663, or § 3663A, or 21 U.S.C. § 853 (q); or (2) impose a term of probation or supervised release with a condition requiring restitution for the full amount of the victim’s loss, if the offense is not an offense for which restitution is authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(1) but otherwise meets the criteria for an order of restitution under that section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This is evident from the strong victim-favorable legislative intent of both the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA) and the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA), making it unlikely that Congress would have intended the weaker, short-lived form of condition-restitution to be available as an alternative to the imposition of a sentence of restitution for those offenses it specifically chose to list in restitution sentences.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(i) A crime of violence, as defined in section 16; (ii) an offense against property under this title [Title 18], or under section 416(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 856(a)), including any offense committed by fraud or deceit; (iii) an offense described in section 1365 (relating to tampering with consumer products); or (iv) an offense under section 670 (relating to theft of medical products).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.