Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 609 F.2d 778 - Jones v. Alexander

Jones v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

609 F.2d 778 · 1980

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
September 2021
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably In Re First Federal Savings And Loan Association Of Durham (1988), Stanley v. Central Intelligence Agency (1981)

44 federal appellate · 1 district ·

49019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 3447 · 10 U.S.C. § 681 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 1653 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Carey v. Piphus · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District · Barrett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “allegations of the complaint, unless patently frivolous, are taken as true to avoid tackling the merits under the ruse of assessing jurisdiction.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the plaintiff must have a clear right to the relief, [and] the defendant must have a clear duty to act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he test for jurisdiction is whether mandamus would be an appropriate means of relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.