Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 B.R. 160 - In Re Toth

In Re Toth’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Fietz v. Great Western Savings (1988), In the Matter of Phyllis Maxine Pence Appeal of Pacesetter Bank of Montpelier

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

1201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1323 · 11 U.S.C. § 1324 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 506

Relies on Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad · Long v. Bullard · Simmons v. Savell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.