Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 61 CONNAPP 275 - State v. Riddick

State v. Riddick’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Rayhall v. Akim Co. (2003), Kelley v. Tomas (2001)

25 state decisions

170200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Golding · State v. Prioleau · Walton v. Town of New Hartford · State v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether we would reach the same conclusion in the exercise of our own judgment, but only [by] whether the trial court acted reasonably”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.