Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 F.3d 900

Docket No. 95-6623.

Harrison v. Huffman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995. Decided: July 18, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 1996 · most notably Inland Empire Public Lands Council v. United States Forest Service (1996), Mouzone-El v. Smith (1995)

25 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-07-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jackie Harrison, appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of VIrginia, Richmond, VA; Leigh Thompson Hanes, Peter Duane Vieth, Wooten & Hart, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for appellees.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harrison v. Huffman, No. CA-94-264-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/61/f3d/900 · .json · Public domain