Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

61 Me. 233

Harmon v. Harmon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1873

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 1873-07-01

ON EXCEPTIONS. The writ in this case, dated June 20, ] 871, contained two counts upon slanderous words, alleged to have been spoken by the defendant concerning the female plaintiff. Those specified as intended to be covered by the second count, which was general, are all to which the exceptions relate.

Decided 1873-07-01

¶1The following rescript was sent down:

DickeRSON, J.

¶2When the statute of limitations is pleaded, and a part of the testimony of a witness, relied upon to fix the time when a particular fact transpired, indicates that it took place be*236fore, and a part of it that it occurred after, the time when the statute of limitations commenced to run, it is the sole province of the jury to determine which part of the testimony is entitled to control.

¶3In an action of slander it is not erroneous in the court to allow the plaintiff to introduce evidence of facts that' took place more than two years before the commencement of the suit, in proof of malice, when the statute of limitations is pleaded.

¶4Exemplary damages are allowable in an action of slander.

¶5Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J.; Cutting, Danpoeth, Virgin, and Peters, JJ., concurred.
/61/me/233 · .json · Public domain