Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 610 F.2d 1385 - Lane v. Chowning

Lane v. Chowning’s Empirical Analysis

610 F.2d 1385 · 1979

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Craft v. Metromedia, Inc. (1985), 589 F. Supp. 1235 - Quintel Corp., N v. v. Citibank, N.A. (1984)

8 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

18019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cole v. United States · United States v. Mitchell · 65 Wash. 2d 157 - Calbom v. Knudtzon · Mason v. Funderburk · 2,606.84 Acres of Land in Tarrant County, Texas, Et Al. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon duly making and filing articles of association and an organization certificate the [national banking] association shall become, as from the date of the execution of its organization certificate, a body corporate, and as such, and in the name designated in the organization certificate, it shall have power [[Image here]] Fifth. To elect or appoint directors, and by its board of directors to appoint a president, vice president, cashier, and other officers, define their duties, require bonds of them, and fix the penalty thereof, dismiss such officers or any of them at pleasure and appoint others to fill their places. (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he only way in which [the CEO] could have substantiated his claims against the attorneys is to have offered proof that [they] contemporaneously performed services for him, personally.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ethical obligation to refrain from participating in [the CEO's] removal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.