610 Pa. 295
18 A.3d 1147
Decided May 5, 2011
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2011-05-05
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2017
8 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“Did the Superior Court properly conclude that the Commonwealth is precluded from seeking application of the school zone mandatory minimum upon violation of a sentence of probation?”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Commonwealth v. Mazzetti
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2011-05-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶2 AND NOW, this 5th day of May 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the Superior Court properly conclude that the Commonwealth is precluded from seeking application of the school zone mandatory minimum upon violation of a sentence of probation?