610 So. 2d 1251 - Carson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State · 471 So. 2d 493 - Ex Parte Faircloth · 439 So. 2d 715 - Maxwell v. City of Mobile · 605 So. 2d 1247 - O'NEIL v. State · 607 So. 2d 344 - McGee v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) A person commits the crime of unlawful distribution of controlled substances if, except as otherwise authorized, he sells, furnishes, gives away, manufactures, delivers or distributes a controlled substance enumerated in schedules I through V.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Clay v. State · Spencer v. State“The appellant contends that the state failed to prove intent because, he says, he did not solicit the sale, supply the drugs, or make any money from the sale. 'A person violates § 13A-12-211 if he "participates”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clay v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.