Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

611 Pa. 657

26 A.3d 484

Stuckey v. Stackpole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 2011

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2011-08-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2014

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-08-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

KARLA M. STUCKEY, Petitioner
v.
DORIS E. STACKPOLE, JENNIFER E. STACKPOLE, AND SUSAN L. STACKPOLE AND ALEX C. STACKPOLE: (DECEASED), BY AND THROUGH HIS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE(S), IN BOTH (A) HIS INDIVIDUAL, PERSONAL CAPACITY AND (B) HIS CAPACITY AS A: TRUSTEE OF THE J. HALL STACKPOLE TRUST, AND SPENCER MORGAN AND EVANS ROSE, JR., ESQUIRE, AND COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C., AND REV. THOMAS DUGAN, SMITHFIELD TRUST COMPANY, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF: ROBERT L. POTTTER, ESQ., E.J. STRASSBURGER, ESQ., AND STRASSBURGER, McKENNA, GUTNICK: & POTTER, P.C., AND "JOHN DOES" 1-100, Respondents.

No. 595 WAL 2010.

¶1Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District.

August 8, 2011.

¶2

ORDER

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

/611/pa/657 · .json · Public domain