Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 611 So. 2d 1250 - Simmons v. State

611 So. 2d 1250 - Simmons v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably 689 So. 2d 235 - State v. Leroux (1996), Watrous v. State (2001)

40 state decisions

250199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. City of Birmingham · 486 So. 2d 592 - Funchess v. Wainwright · Trujillo v. United States · 413 So. 2d 461 - Zambuto v. State · 480 So. 2d 228 - Ray v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a trial court is always well-advised, when accepting a plea, to ascertain whether any promises were made to the defendant apart from those discussed during the plea colloquy.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an attorney who promises a certain favorable result—particularly one who does so to convince the client that a `maximum' sentence is shorter than it appears—operates at the risk he or she later will be accused of ineffectiveness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[n]either the trial court nor counsel is required to forewarn a defendant about every conceivable collateral consequence of a plea to criminal charges”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.