Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 612 SE2D 639 - In Re ADL

In Re ADL’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

34 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1901 (§ 2 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1902 (§ 3 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1903 (§ 4 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978)

Relies on Matter of Montgomery · 140 N.C. App. 288 - In Re Huff · 143 N.C. App. 402 - In Re McMillon · 91 N.C. App. 668 - Clark v. Williamson · 117 N.C. App. 693 - In Re Nolen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as defined by the Act. Once it has been determined that the proceeding is a child custody proceeding, it must then be determined whether the child is an Indian child. Id. (internal citations omitted).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “except for the initial hearing following the entry of the non-secure order to assume custody of the juveniles in August of 2001, the guardian ad litem was noted as present at each and every hearing prior to and including the TPR hearing where she represented the interest of the children. In addition, the guardian ad litem was named in the TPR petition.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he petition, or motion pursuant to G.S. 7B-1102, . . . shall set forth such of the following facts as are known; and with respect to the facts which are unknown the petitioner or movant shall so state: . . . (6) Facts that are sufficient to warrant a determination that one or more of the grounds for terminating parental rights exist.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.