Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

614 Pa. 313

36 A.3d 589

Kaplan v. Bayer Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 2012

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2012-02-01

Decided 2012-02-01

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2012, as Petitioners’ Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction replaced the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction, the initial Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DISMISSED. Additionally, the Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief and the Motion for Leave to Supplement Application are GRANTED. Furthermore, the Amended Application for Exercise of King’s Bench Powers or Extraordinary Jurisdiction is DENIED. *314 Finally, the Motion for Consolidation is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

/614/pa/313 · .json · Public domain