Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

616 Pa. 608

52 A.3d 251

Commonwealth v. Renchenski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2012

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2012-09-28

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably 2014 Pa. Super. 44 - Commonwealth v. Orie (2014), Commonwealth v. Patterson (2018)

1 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-09-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Justice TODD,

¶1concurring.

¶2I join the Majority Opinion, as I agree an amended Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”) petition may be dismissed under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9543(b) for prejudicial delay in filing the amendment. What I view as an open question, however, is the degree to which, if at all, claims made in an original petition survive the dismissal of an amended petition under such circumstances. Nevertheless, neither the Superi- or Court nor the parties herein make any such distinction even though, in response to the Commonwealth’s motion, the PCRA court dismissed both Appellant’s original and amended petition. Accordingly, our resolution of this question must await another day.

/616/pa/608 · .json · Public domain