United States v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis
617 F.2d 48 · 1980
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 5 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Bazzano (1983), United States v. Rodriguez (1982)
17 federal appellate · 5 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651
Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · Ex parte United States · Hulver v. United States · United States v. Ellenbogen · United States v. Workman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot obtain credit against the five-year period for any period of time during which he was not in fact under probationary supervision by virtue of his wrongful act.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The court may revoke or modify any condition of probation, or may change the period of probation. The period of probation, together with any extension thereof, shall not exceed five years.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he unconstitutional aspects of the revocation hearing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Grimsley v. Dodson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.