619 Pa. 466
65 A.3d 291
Decided April 9, 2013
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2013-04-09
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 2014
1 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“Is it possible to meet the test for after-discovered evidence where the defendant proffers no evidence, but instead relies on a newspaper article?”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Commonwealth v. Castro
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-04-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ORDER
¶2AND NOW, this 9th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by petitioner, is:
Is it possible to meet the test for after-discovered evidence where the defendant proffers no evidence, but instead relies on a newspaper article?
¶3Petitioner’s Petition for Leave to File Reply to Brief in Opposition to Commonwealth’s Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.