King v. . Barnes

Decided October 25, 1887

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1887-10-25

Three appeals and three motions in this action were argued and disposed of together. As to the appeals the following is the mem. of the opinion: “First. The judgment of the Special Term entered on the 2d day of August, 1886, was an interlocutory judgment.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1887-10-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1921

7 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Earl, J.,

¶1 reads mem. disposing of the matters as follows:

¶2 1st. Appeal from General Term order, affirming interlocutory judgment, dismissed.

¶3 *648 2d. Appeal from General Term order, reversing order of trial court and allowing amendment of complaint, dismissed.

¶4 3d. Appeal from General Term order, denying stay of proceedings, dismissed.

¶5 4th. Motion to amend return denied.

¶6 5th. Motion to consolidate appeals denic d.

¶7 6th. Motion to stay proceedings denied

¶8 All concur.

¶9 Ordered accordingly.