Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

62 So. 3d 1240

Mann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-06-15

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2016

3 state decisions

Relies on Willingham v. State · Dixon v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BLACK, Judge.

¶1 We affirm George Mann’s conviction and sentence for robbery with a weapon without comment. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error apparent on the face of the written judgment. While the record reflects that Mann was convicted of robbery with a weapon, the written judgment erroneously indicates he was convicted of robbery with a firearm. See Willingham v. State, 48 So.3d 173, 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Carter v. State, 32 So.3d 67, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

¶2 Judgment and sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions.

DAVIS and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
/62/so3d/1240 · .json · Public domain