Kupau v. Yamamoto’s Empirical Analysis
622 F.2d 449 · 1980
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2013 · most notably Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen & Packers v. Crowley (1984), Crowley v. Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen, & Packers (1982)
18 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 29 U.S.C. § 401 (Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959) · 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 412 · 29 U.S.C. § 481 · 29 U.S.C. § 482 · 29 U.S.C. § 483
Relies on Dunlop v. Bachowski · Calhoon v. Harvey · Rodriquez v. United States · Thaggard v. United States · Saxbe v. Washington Post Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Pre-Election Remedies Under the Landrum-Griffin Act,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“challenging an election already conducted,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Total preemption of Title I Relief by Title IV in the area of elections is belied by the legislative history of the LMRDA. Title IV had been drafted, discussed, and approved before Title I was even proposed. Congress added Title I at least partly in response to fears that Title IV was not strong enough to effectuate the central purpose of the LMRDA, the preservation of union democracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.