Shurtleff v. Jay Tuft & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2013
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 46 Ill. App. 3d 350 - Burrus v. Itek Corp. · 9 Utah 2d 275 - Webb v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation · 26 Utah 2d 448 - Rowley v. Graven Brothers & Company · Shaw v. Jeppson · Edwards v. Didericksen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the jury is entitled to consider ... opinion evidence, even though it may have embraced the ultimate factual issue to be decided by the jury[,] for whatever weight it felt [the evidence] deserved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Louder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.