Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 622 So. 2d 31 - Wilson v. State

622 So. 2d 31 - Wilson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2011

10 state decisions

50199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 520 So. 2d 582 - King v. State · Williams v. State · 418 So. 2d 1277 - Chang v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`the jury has no right to exercise its `pardon' power if there is no evidence of attempt or of a lesser included offense and no instruction on attempt or lesser included offense should be given in such a situation because it would merely confuse the jury.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “WHERE THE VICTIMS TESTIFY THAT THE DEFENDANT COMPLETED THE CHARGED OFFENSES OF CAPITAL SEXUAL BATTERY OF A VICTIM UNDER 12 AND LEWD AND LASCIVIOUS ASSAULT, AND THE DEFENDANT TOTALLY DENIES COMMISSION OF ANY OFFENSE, IS A TRIAL COURT REQUIRED TO INSTRUCT A JURY ON ATTEMPT IF REQUESTED TO DO SO BY THE DEFENDANT?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “By its nature, attempt occupies the conceptual area between the non-commission of the greater offense and the completion of the greater offense itself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.