Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 626 NE2D 803 - Conner v. State

Conner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably Richardson v. State (1999), Bivins v. State (1995)

1 federal appellate · 32 state decisions

130199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hollars v. State · Clark v. State · Best v. State · Mills v. State · Taylor v. Indiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[alll penalties shall be proportioned to the nature of the offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'only when a criminal penalty is not graduated and proportioned to the nature of the offense”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person who knowingly or intentionally delivers or finances the delivery of any substance, other than a controlled substance or a drug for which a prescription is required under federal or state law, that: (1) Is expressly or impliedly represented to be a controlled substance; (2) Is distributed under circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that the substance is a controlled substance; or (3) By overall dosage unit appearance, including shape, color, size, markings, or lack of markings, taste, consistency, or any other identifying physical characteristic of the substance, would lead a reasonable person to believe the substance is a controlled substance; commits dealing in a substance represented to be a controlled substance, a Class D felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.