Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

626 Pa. 123

Commonwealth v. Rose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 8, 2014

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2014-07-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2015

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-07-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*124ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by the Commonwealth, is as follows:

Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding, as a matter of first impression, that [Respondent] was entitled to a reduced punishment under the ex post facto clause for a murder that he had yet to commit when the law was changed to increase the punishment prior to the victim’s death?
/626/pa/123 · .json · Public domain