United States v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
628 F.2d 461 · 1980
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2015 · most notably Florida v. Royer (1983), United States v. Phillips (1981)
37 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3651
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · United States v. Mendenhall · Delaware v. Prouse · Sibron v. State of New York Peters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a familiar rule of statutory interpretation that a specific provision will govern notwithstanding the fact that a general provision, standing alone, may include the same subject matter. 55 Section 3651, in providing, as a condition of probation, restitution or reparation to aggrieved parties for actual damages or losses caused by the offense committed, requires that such funds be directed to the victims (i.e.,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“caused by the offense for which conviction was had,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.