Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 629 F.3d 369 - Bonds v. Leavitt

Bonds v. Leavitt’s Empirical Analysis

629 F.3d 369 · 2011

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 1214 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment and create an abusive work environment,” and (4)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the employer's knowledge that the plaintiff engaged in a protected activity is absolutely necessary”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.