¶1Appellant asserts that he was improperly convicted of the lesser-included offense of grand theft since the information which charged him with robbery failed to allege the value of the property taken. We agree that the information was inadequate to support a conviction of grand theft, and we reverse and remand to the trial court for entry of a judgment for petit theft. See J.C.B. v. State, 512 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So.2d 586 (Fla.1988).
633 So. 2d 120
Carrodine v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 21, 1994
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-03-21
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1995
1 state decisions
Relies on 520 So. 2d 582 - King v. State · 512 So. 2d 1073 - JCB v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1994-03-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →