Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 634 A2D 1270 - State v. Corson

State v. Corson’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Poulin v. Colby College · Orr v. First National Stores, Inc. · State v. MacDonald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Operating after habitual offender revocation. A person commits operating after habitual offender revocation if that person: A. Operates a motor vehicle on a public way, as defined in Title 17-A, section 505, subsection 2, when that person’s license to operate a motor vehicle has been revoked under this subchapter or former Title 29, chapter 18-A and that person: (1) Has received written notice of the revocation from the Secretary of State; (2) Has been orally informed of the revocation by a law enforcement officer; (3) Has actual knowledge of the revocation; or (4) Is a person to whom written notice was sent in accordance with section 2482 or former Title 29, section 2241, subsection 4; or B. After having one or more prior convictions for violating former section 2557, this section or section 2558, violates section 2412-A. 2. Penalties. The following penalties apply- A. A person is guilty of a Class D crime if the person violates subsection 1 and: (1) The person has not been convicted for operating after revocation under this section or under former Title 29, section 2298 within the previous 10 years; and (2) The person has not received an OUI conviction within the previous 10 years. The minimum fine for a Class D crime under this paragraph is $500 and the minimum term of imprisonment is 30 days, neither of which may be suspended by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ny public highway or sidewalk, private way laid out under authority of statute, way dedicated to public use, way upon which the public has a, right of access or has access as invitees or licensees, or way under the control of park commissioners or a body having like powers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.