Rivera-Colón v. Mills’s Empirical Analysis
635 F.3d 9 · 2011
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 24 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Maria Feliciano De La Cruz Erasmo Jimenez and Their Conjugal Partnership El Conquistador Resort and Country Club and Hugh Andrews · Gu v. Boston Police Department · Barton v. Clancy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“view[s] the facts in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In evaluating whether there is a genuine issue of material fact, the court examines the recordpleadings, affidavits, depositions, admissions, and answers to interrogatoriesviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.