¶1We review Baker v. State, 614 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), based on conflict. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
¶2We recently resolved the issue presented in this ease in Metcalf v. State, 635 So.2d 11 (Fla.1994), where we found a due process violation when police used illegally manufactured drugs in a reverse-sting operation. On authority of Metcalfwe quash the decision under review.
¶3It is so ordered.