¶1AFFIRMED. We believe the trial court’s inquiry at trial into appellant’s complaints about his counsel was sufficient under the circumstances of this ease. See Watts v. State, 593 So.2d 198 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 3006, 120 L.Ed.2d 881 (1992); Causey v. State, 623 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), rev. denied, No. 82,845 (Fla. Feb. 17, 1994); Boudreau v. Carlisle, 549 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), cause dismissed, 557 So.2d 866 (Fla.1990).
636 So. 2d 156
Thomas v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 27, 1994
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-04-27
Relies on Doerr v. Doerr · Martin v. Delaware · 557 So. 2d 865 - Morrow v. State
Decided 1994-04-27