Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

638 So. 2d 209

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-06-24

Relies on Anders v. California · Smith v. State · Postell v. State

Decided 1994-06-24

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this Anders appeal,1 we ñnd no error occurred below and we affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we strike that part of the probation order which charges Hernandez with a Public Defender’s fee of $200.00, since he was not advised of his right to contest the fee, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720. See, e.g., Smith v. State, 632 So.2d 99 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Dujfey v. State, 629 So.2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

¶2AFFIRMED in part; assessment of Public Defender fees STRICKEN.

HARRIS, C.J., and W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

¶3. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

/638/so2d/209 · .json · Public domain