Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

64 A.3d 1072

Commonwealth v. Rose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2013

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2013-02-20

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2013

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-02-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether the Superior Court erred in concluding that the PCRA court’s failure to provide notice pursuant to Pa. R.Crim.P. 907 was permissible in this case.

¶3The Motion for Leave to File a Reply to the Answer is DENIED. It is further ordered that the trial court is directed to appoint counsel to assist Petitioner on appeal to this Court.

/64/a3d/1072 · .json · Public domain