Mathis v. Rose

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1900

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1900-06-18

<p>On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Su-preme Court, see antep. 45.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1900-06-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1979

3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the-reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Van Syckel.

¶2For affirmance — Depue (Chief Justice), Gummere,. Ludlow, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Vre-

¶3DENBURGH, VOORHEES. 9.

¶4For' reversal—None.