Pierce v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 520 So. 2d 582 - King v. State · 512 So. 2d 1073 - JCB v. State · 616 So. 2d 1194 - In Interest of EW
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] defendant may not be convicted of a permissive lesser included offense where the charging document is silent as to an essential element of that offense, absent a waiver, affirmative conduct, or other exceptional circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“reject[ed] the state's argument that defense counsel's objection lacked specificity and thus waived review of this issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“defense counsel objected to any instructions on offenses other than the armed robbery as charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.