Davis v. Muellar’s Empirical Analysis
643 F.2d 521 · 1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2024
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 25 U.S.C. § 1301 (§ 201 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 25 U.S.C. § 1451 (Indian Financing Act) · 25 U.S.C. § 450 (§ 2 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975) · 25 U.S.C. § 461 · 25 U.S.C. § 476 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Younger v. Harris · Gerstein v. Pugh · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Bates v. State Bar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e are unable to find that the United States has by policy, by treaty by statute or by court decision decreed [the state's] loss of personal jurisdiction over [the defendant] as a penalty for having arrested [him] in violation of the tribal extradition ordinance here involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.